Tag Archives: facebook

Facebook’s algorithms don’t read so stop writing for them

typewriter

When it comes to determining what good content is, Facebook’s been acting a lot like Google.

In 2011, Google released Panda, an update to the algorithm which determines what users see and – more importantly – don’t see in its search results, particularly that crucial first page. The effect was immediate for some publishers and those that survived were forced to radically change their business models.

Panda was, in Google’s words, an effort “to give people the most relevant answers to their queries as quickly as possible.” Google’s subsequent algorithm changes only reinforced this mission to deliver high-quality content by making poor-quality content disappear.

With recent announcements that it would cut down on “News Feed spam,” and “click-baiting,” Facebook is essentially warning publishers not to create content for algorithms because algorithms could change tomorrow and wipe you out.

Sound familiar? This is what happens when we try to make content perform instead of inform.

STOP TRYING TO GAME THE SYSTEM

Whether it’s Google or Facebook, the big gatekeepers keep telling us it’s a waste of time to write to an algorithm that might change at a moment’s notice yet we keep doing it anyway. It’s an ineffective way to spend scant resources and, ironically, the tricks we’re using to get people to click, share and comment obscure the fact that most publishers do create quality content.

Facebook made two recent changes to its News Feed algorithm. The first targets clickbaiters, those nefarious pages that either trick you into clicking a link with an enticing headline that never really pays off or keep a key piece of the story behind a link. The second is aimed at clever community managers who route around the lower reach of Facebook’s link posts by creating better-performing photo posts with a link in the caption. Both tactics will now result in posts with diminished visibility in the News Feed.

For brands and publishers already facing down the era of zero organic Facebook reach, these changes may seem like another shot across the bow: a suggestion that paid efforts will be the only way to guarantee a certain number of eyeballs.

HOW TO GET FACEBOOK TO WORK FOR YOU

The good news is if social marketers created this problem, we can also solve it.

First, let’s stop writing content for Facebook’s metrics and go back to relying on content that relates to our overall business goals: awareness, education or engagement, to name a few.

Let’s create content that’s concise, understandable on a scan within the feed and rewards the user for the time spent reading it. We know many people don’t read past the headline so why deliberately write it to obscure what matters most in a story? If we give a reader something of value at the beginning, they’ll assume we have more to offer at the end.

Most importantly, let’s consider the unique role each of our social channels plays in the overall marketing mix and stop focusing all our efforts on just one. When we’ve optimized our best content with an informative headline and an engaging graphic, we can share that link on Facebook and use paid dollars there to increase its visibility and earned media traction. Meanwhile, those gorgeous photos can go on Instagram or Pinterest and the clever joke or meme will get published on Twitter.

If nothing else, let’s make sure our content reads like it was written for a purpose and doesn’t resemble a hyper-caffeinated, all-caps email from our aunt. Readers will reward us with organic clicks, likes and comments and we can all sleep better at night knowing we didn’t goad them into doing it by appealing to their lesser demons.

After all, having conversation with humans – not algorithms – is why we started experimenting with social in the first place.

Image: guidedbycthulhu

Links to the past: Lyndon Johnson’s pants edition

Normally, these Sunday week-in-review posts will have a few blog posts in between. Guess it was a busy week. Onward then:

This past week was the anniversary of the E2 club disaster. Thomas Conner of The Sun-Times looks at how it changed Chicago club safety and licensing.

Won’t usually be self-linking in this space but Cork & Kerry in Beverly has a new exterior patio wall meant to ape the St. James Gate at the Guinness brewery. I posted a photo of it to Instagram. (Follow me on Instagram via ourmaninchicago).

Chicago comedian Kate MacKinnon was hysterical on SNL last week as a woman in a Russian village who witnessed the fall of meteorites. “Bear with me, Seth…”

Via Charlie Meyerson, here is an animated recording of Lyndon Johnson ordering pants.

I loved this piece by fellow Ohio U./ACRN-FM alum Jillian Mapes on Catfish, meeting people online and self-presentation. It was in Maura magazine, which you can subscribe to here.

Seth Lavin’s Chicago School Wonks e-newsletter used to be required reading before he stopped publishing it to take a full-time job teaching. But he’s still contributing to the Chicago school reform debate. Here are ten questions he asked in the wake of proposed Chicago public school closings with responses from CPS.

Playboy got the Wall Street Journal to run with the idea that it’s more about making money through licensing than nudes these days, a continuing effort to leave its past behind. Nevermind that revenue is down significantly and it missed its 2012 profit projections and its CEO earned both HR complaints about his behavior and a lawsuit accusing him of embezzlement.

Esquire‘s Charlie Pierce calls the waaaaahh-mbulance on Politico.

Taste of Chicago lost $1.3 million dollars last year.

Rainbow Cone opens March 6th!

Facebook conducted an audit of its Insights tool and “uncovered bugs that impacted impression and reach reporting.”

The posting, removal and subsequent re-posting of a NASCAR crash video should have some interesting implications on the attempts of brands to claim copyright of fan-created content.

And finally, it looks like someone started a new site with the old EveryBlock code at chicago.wikiblock.com.

Facebook users: When a handful is only a couple of fingers

I’m still waiting for the whole Facebook terms of service fracas to fully shake out before I decide what I’m going to do about the minimal content I have posted there.***

But I will say I’ve composed a possible letter in my head to friends, asking them to consider removing photos with me in them since the majority of the me-related content of FB comes from other people. I know I’m not alone here, and it’s something few commentators have mentioned thus far, which is odd. I don’t own that content, and while you could certainly mount a legal challenge against your friends over unlawful use of your image if you really wanted to…do you really want to? Maybe this is the third day story.

You know what’s not helping though? Posts like “Facebook Losing Members Over ‘Terms of Service’ Changes” from Media Bistro’s WebNewser, which mention that a “handful” of users are canceling their accounts then goes on to cite only two people: CNBC’s Becky Quick and the NYT’s Sasha Frere-Jones. One might further question the worth of the piece when one realizes that the post refers to Jones as a woman. Um, he’s not.

*** As I wrote this, I noticed that Facebook posted a mention on its members’ home page, saying it’s going back to its old terms of use. You know what’s unsettling about Facebook? It seems to have an uncanny ability to piss off its user base. Almost like it’s so ignorant of their needs and wants that it tries to push things through despite the possible repercussions, just to see if it can get its way. I wonder why that is.